[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46052FC0.8080804@trash.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:03:44 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5 2.6.21-rc4] l2tp: pppol2tp core
James Chapman wrote:
> [PPPOL2TP]: Add PPP-over-L2TP driver core.
>
> This driver handles only L2TP data frames; control frames are handled
> by a userspace application. The dfriver implements L2TP using the
> PPPoX socket family. Data is sent or received using regular socket
> sendmsg() / recvmsg() calls. Kernel parameters of the socket can be
> read or modified using ioctl() or [gs]etsockopt() calls.
The interaction with UDP sockets looks pretty horrible IMO. On the
send side I don't see why you can't simply build the UDP header
yourself instead of doing these set_fs + sendmsgs hacks. On the
receive side I it would be nice if you could use the encapsulation
socket stuff thats also used by IPsec.
A couple of random comments:
- your list locking is broken
- list_for_each_entry_safe is only needed if you remove something
while iterating, its no replacement for locking
- SOCK_2_SESSION/SOCK_2_TUNNEL are terribly ugly and should
probably be inline functions that use BUG_ON in case of an
invalid magic
- You should use skb_queue_walk for queue walking
- You should use endian-annotated types
- pppol2tp_fget: why do you want to open sockets for other processes?
I hope this can go together with the sendmsg hacks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists