netdev - Re: [Bonding-devel] quick help with bonding?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:48:15 -0400
From:	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
To:	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Cc:	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
	bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] quick help with bonding?

On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:26:07PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Chris Friesen wrote:
> > Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > 
> >> If you are looking for a decent source for patches you could consider
> >> downloading the latest source-rpm from RHEL4/CentOS4.  The bonding
> >> driver in those releases have been updated to much later code and I can
> >> tell you from personal experience they work pretty well.
> 
> > I'm just about to load a kernel with a backport of bonding from 2.6.14. 
> >  I'll try it out and if it doesn't help I'll try the RHEL4 one.
> 
> No joy on the 2.6.14 backport, so I guess I'll try the RHEL4 route.
> 

Ah, ok.  I'm not too sure how different the 2.6.9 and 2.6.10 bonding
code was, so it might take a little tweaking but I'm guessing there
won't be significant differences.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html