[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461A9DF1.8080904@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:11:29 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dim@...nvz.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, johannes@...solutions.net,
jgarzik@...ox.com, containers@...ts.osdl.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, greearb@...delatech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add etun driver
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> The core mechanism for network configuration does not support creating
> virtual devices in a extensible reusable way.
>
> In particular the tunnel types supported by iproute2 are hard coded
> into the user space tool and into the kernel interface. The interface
> seems to be not the least bit extensible for creating new types of
> non hardware backed network devices.
Yes, it sucks.
> So I don't see a readily usable mechanism for network configuration in
> netlink.
Thats why I suggested that we should create one, ideally before adding
more sysfs/proc/ioctl/... based interfaces, which we'll have a hard time
getting rid of again.
I could take care of this if you don't mind waiting until 2.6.23.
> The fact that netlink it uses unreliable packets and an
> asynchronous interface just adds to the difficulty in making use of
> it.
Its reliable on the userspace->kernel path as long as you don't use
MSG_DONTWAIT.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists