netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: Add etun driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1176150557.8459.47.camel@johannes.berg>
Date:	Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:29:17 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	dim@...nvz.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
	shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, greearb@...delatech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add etun driver

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 22:11 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> Thats why I suggested that we should create one, ideally before adding
> more sysfs/proc/ioctl/... based interfaces, which we'll have a hard time
> getting rid of again.

But then how would we configure initial parameters along with creating
the interface? That's something that's good to have, and I don't see how
you can allow it generically.

Then again, you can of course always add an interface and then change
its operating parameters etc. but that isn't atomic any more.

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (191 bytes)