lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-id: <461B48A8.1060904@qumranet.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:19:52 +0300 From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com> To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] QEMU PIC indirection patch for in-kernel APIC work Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:38:18PM +0300, Avi Kivity (avi@...ranet.com) wrote: > >>> But I don't get this "we can enhance the kernel but not userspace" vibe >>> 8( >>> >>> >> I've been waiting for network aio since ~2003. If it arrives in the >> next few days, I'm all for it; much more than kvm can use it >> profitably. But I'm not going to write that interface myself. >> > > Hmm, you missed at least two implementations of network aio in the > previous year, and now with syslets we can have third one. > I meant, network aio in the mainline kernel. I am aware of the various out-of-tree implementations. > But it looks from this discussion, that it will not prevent from > changing in-kernel driver - place a hook into skb allocation path and > allocate data from opposing memory - get pages from another side and put > them into fragments, then copy headers into skb->data. > I don't understand this (opposing memory, another side?). Can you elaborate? -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists