[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <461B48A8.1060904@qumranet.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:19:52 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] QEMU PIC indirection patch for in-kernel APIC work
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:38:18PM +0300, Avi Kivity (avi@...ranet.com) wrote:
>
>>> But I don't get this "we can enhance the kernel but not userspace" vibe
>>> 8(
>>>
>>>
>> I've been waiting for network aio since ~2003. If it arrives in the
>> next few days, I'm all for it; much more than kvm can use it
>> profitably. But I'm not going to write that interface myself.
>>
>
> Hmm, you missed at least two implementations of network aio in the
> previous year, and now with syslets we can have third one.
>
I meant, network aio in the mainline kernel. I am aware of the various
out-of-tree implementations.
> But it looks from this discussion, that it will not prevent from
> changing in-kernel driver - place a hook into skb allocation path and
> allocate data from opposing memory - get pages from another side and put
> them into fragments, then copy headers into skb->data.
>
I don't understand this (opposing memory, another side?). Can you
elaborate?
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists