[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1176196734.8459.74.camel@johannes.berg>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:18:54 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dim@...nvz.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, greearb@...delatech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add etun driver
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 09:52 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Shouldn't be a problem either. Creating the device atomically also
> prevents that anything else is setting them UP before they're fully
> configured.
How would you do it generically then? I'm absolutely not opposed to the
idea but for now haven't seen how to do it.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (191 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists