[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461B5E42.2030900@trash.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:52:02 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dim@...nvz.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, greearb@...delatech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add etun driver
Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 09:52 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>
>>Shouldn't be a problem either. Creating the device atomically also
>>prevents that anything else is setting them UP before they're fully
>>configured.
>
>
> How would you do it generically then? I'm absolutely not opposed to the
> idea but for now haven't seen how to do it.
Without having thought much about it yet, roughly like this:
- driver receives RTM_NEWLINK message (under rtnl)
- driver allocates new device
- driver initializes device based on content of RTM_NEWLINK message
- driver returns
Device creation won't be generic of course since only the driver knows
how to do that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists