netdev - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8325] New: -j REDIRECT --to-ports 1000-1009, always first choosen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070416052535.M41456@visp.net.lb>
Date:	Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:26:35 +0300
From:	"Denys" <denys@...p.net.lb>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, wijata@...-labs.com
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"bugme-daemon@...nel-bugs.osdl.org" 
	<bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8325] New: -j REDIRECT --to-ports 1000-1009, always first choosen

Sorry, i will put my IMHO, since i am using it too.

I guess it can be useful for load-balancing scenario.
Is there way to provide both ways?
Thinking... 60% done, But maybe this can be done over -m statistic already

On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:12:33 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:53:12 -0700
> > bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8325
> >>
> >>           Summary: -j REDIRECT --to-ports 1000-1009, always first choosen
> >>    Kernel Version: 2.6.19-1.2911.fc6PAE 2.6.19-gentoo-r4
> >>            Status: NEW
> >>          Severity: normal
> >>             Owner: networking_netfilter-iptables@...nel-bugs.osdl.org
> >>         Submitter: wijata@...-labs.com
> >>
> >>
> >>Most recent kernel where this bug did *NOT* occur:
> >>Distribution: FC6, gentoo
> >>Hardware Environment:
> >>Software Environment:
> >>Problem Description:
> >>
> >>Steps to reproduce:
> >>Try redirecting to range of ports with iptables, kernel(?) will always 
redirect 
> >>to first port from given range.
> 
> It will use a different port if there is a clash (a connection with the
> same identity already exists). I'm guessing you're expecting that it
> will use the ports in order. We might be able to change that, but I
> don't really see a case where it would make sense. Please describe what
> you're trying to do.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html