[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <462309F9.6050005@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:30:33 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Denys <denys@...p.net.lb>
CC: wijata@...-labs.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"bugme-daemon@...nel-bugs.osdl.org"
<bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8325] New: -j REDIRECT --to-ports 1000-1009,
always first choosen
Denys wrote:
> Sorry, i will put my IMHO, since i am using it too.
>
> I guess it can be useful for load-balancing scenario.
That makes sense with using multiple IPs (and we support doing that),
but whats the point of load-balancing to differenet *ports*?
> Is there way to provide both ways?
> Thinking... 60% done, But maybe this can be done over -m statistic already
2.6.21-rc supports randomized port selection (with iptables userspace
from SVN). Using the statistic match would work as well.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists