netdev - Re: [PATCH 9/9] net_device: dont include wext bits if not required

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:53:04 -0700
From:	Jean Tourrilhes <jt@....hp.com>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] net_device: dont include wext bits if not required

On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:07:41PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> This patch makes the wext bits in struct net_device depend on
> CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>

	I personally would not do that. Having conditional fields in
"struct net_device" is very bad, it's a sure way to crash on modules
in some cases. If I remember well, Jeff Garzik has been fighting those
over the years.

	Jean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html