netdev - Re: [PATCH 7/9] wext: reduce inline abuse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200704261903.27932.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:03:27 +0200
From:	Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To:	jt@....hp.com
Cc:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] wext: reduce inline abuse

On Thursday 26 April 2007 18:50:32 Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:07:39PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > This patch removes a bunch of inline abuse from wext. Most functions
> > that were marked inline are only used once so the compiler will inline
> > them anyway, others are used multiple times but there's no requirement
> > for them to be inline since they aren't in any fast paths.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> 
> 	That's clearly not true of all compilers. All gcc versions
> before 4.0 need serious help to inline functions used only once. Our
> current minimal requirement for the kernel is gcc 3.2, therefore this
> code is still useful.
> 	Note that this is a legitimate use of inline (tell the
> compiler to inline the function), not an abuse.

By my personal definition _every_ use of inline is abuse, if it's not
in an absolute fastpath and applied to a really tiny function.
Sure, other people have different opinions on that, but I think
with my approach we get smallest code with good speed.
In general I try to avoid inline whereever possible.
I think this patch is OK and should go in.

Often it's even desired to have out of line functions in fastpaths.
See spinlocks.

-- 
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html