lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:43:48 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, jeff@...zik.org, paulus@...ba.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rename get_property to of_get_property: drivers/net On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:47:54 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote: > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> > Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:44:46 +1000 > > > So can I take this as a future OK for architecture specific network > > drivers changes to go through the architecture trees (cc'd to you)? > > It's been my experience that if I'm just working through some > platform or bus specific API changes, people like Jeff tend to > not mind if it goes via ARCH trees and the like. This all started with me having a dummyspit over yet another huge reject because of intersections between subsystem trees. Normally we get away with it but when there's so much material pending, things deteriorate. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists