netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rename get_property to of_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070429004348.ea30f3fc.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:43:48 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, jeff@...zik.org, paulus@...ba.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rename get_property to of_get_property: drivers/net

On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:47:54 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:44:46 +1000
> 
> > So can I take this as a future OK for architecture specific network
> > drivers changes to go through the architecture trees (cc'd to you)?
> 
> It's been my experience that if I'm just working through some
> platform or bus specific API changes, people like Jeff tend to
> not mind if it goes via ARCH trees and the like.

This all started with me having a dummyspit over yet another huge reject
because of intersections between subsystem trees.

Normally we get away with it but when there's so much material pending,
things deteriorate.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html