[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070428.204754.62343452.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc: jeff@...zik.org, paulus@...ba.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rename get_property to of_get_property: drivers/net
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:44:46 +1000
> So can I take this as a future OK for architecture specific network
> drivers changes to go through the architecture trees (cc'd to you)?
It's been my experience that if I'm just working through some
platform or bus specific API changes, people like Jeff tend to
not mind if it goes via ARCH trees and the like.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists