lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:44:46 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	paulus@...ba.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rename get_property to of_get_property: drivers/net

On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:30:38 -0400 Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
>
> Sorry for your being a football here.

That's OK.

> AFAICS, looking at the two patches, it seems clear they should go in via
> Paulus's tree.  There are clear dependencies, and it is clearly
> arch-specific code.

So can I take this as a future OK for architecture specific network
drivers changes to go through the architecture trees (cc'd to you)?

> If anything, it sounds like I should drop a ucc_geth patch or two from
> my tree.  Is that the case?

No, my patches can wait (there are backward compatibility hacks in place)
so once you have merged your changes with Linus (I am assuming it won't
be to long), we will put these through Paulus' tree.

(The ucc_geth stuff was a pain, but the real kicker (as far as I was
concered) was the ehea changes - parts of that driver have been
completely rewritten in your tree.)

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists