netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rename get_property to of_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070429114446.31f40a30.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:44:46 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	paulus@...ba.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rename get_property to of_get_property: drivers/net

On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:30:38 -0400 Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
>
> Sorry for your being a football here.

That's OK.

> AFAICS, looking at the two patches, it seems clear they should go in via
> Paulus's tree.  There are clear dependencies, and it is clearly
> arch-specific code.

So can I take this as a future OK for architecture specific network
drivers changes to go through the architecture trees (cc'd to you)?

> If anything, it sounds like I should drop a ucc_geth patch or two from
> my tree.  Is that the case?

No, my patches can wait (there are backward compatibility hacks in place)
so once you have merged your changes with Linus (I am assuming it won't
be to long), we will put these through Paulus' tree.

(The ucc_geth stuff was a pain, but the real kicker (as far as I was
concered) was the ehea changes - parts of that driver have been
completely rewritten in your tree.)

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped