[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4633689E.50900@garzik.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:30:38 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, paulus@...ba.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
CC: ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rename get_property to of_get_property: drivers/net
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> This is part of the consolidation of the OpenFirmware code ebtween
> PowerPC and Sparc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
> drivers/net/bmac.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/net/mace.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/net/pasemi_mac.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/spider_net.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/net/sungem.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/sungem_phy.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ucc_geth.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c | 4 ++--
> 9 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> Jeff,
>
> This patch is based on a merge between Paulus' for-2.6.22 tree and your
> upstream tree. As such it depends on changes in Paulus' tree to be
> merged first. This patch was originally in Paulus' tree but has been
> reverted from there.
Sorry for your being a football here.
AFAICS, looking at the two patches, it seems clear they should go in via
Paulus's tree. There are clear dependencies, and it is clearly
arch-specific code.
If anything, it sounds like I should drop a ucc_geth patch or two from
my tree. Is that the case?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists