[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4638400D.5010306@garzik.org>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 03:38:53 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: mchan@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/20][BNX2]: Enhance the heartbeat.
David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
> Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 03:17:20 -0400
>
>> Michael Chan wrote:
>>> [BNX2]: Enhance the heartbeat.
>>>
>>> In addition to the periodic heartbeat, we're adding a heartbeat
>>> request interrupt when the heartbeat is late. This is useful
>>> especially in -rt kernels where the timer frequently runs late.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>
>> Should we really be adding code for such a special situation to upstream
>> code?
>>
>> I lean towards "no", but defer to your and DaveM's judgement here.
>
> My understanding of this situation is that if the timer is delayed a
> lot, which can happen with the -rt kernel, we don't send the heartbeat
> ping to the chip within the required margin.
>
> If the margin is not met, the ASF firmware takes this as a signal that
> the host system is down, and does things like reset the network card
> and other things we don't want it to do.
Thanks for the explanation.
My main concern was
* adding code to use a kernel facility
* then, adding code to handle when that kernel facility doesn't work
and also
* adding code for a situation that never occurs in the upstream kernel.
Regards,
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists