netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rename get_property to of_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46389D85.7000301@garzik.org>
Date:	Wed, 02 May 2007 10:17:41 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
	paulus@...ba.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rename get_property to of_get_property: drivers/net

Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On Apr 28, 2007, at 10:47 PM, David Miller wrote:
> 
>> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
>> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:44:46 +1000
>>
>>> So can I take this as a future OK for architecture specific network
>>> drivers changes to go through the architecture trees (cc'd to you)?
>>
>> It's been my experience that if I'm just working through some
>> platform or bus specific API changes, people like Jeff tend to
>> not mind if it goes via ARCH trees and the like.
> 
> Is this acceptable?   Just want to make sure before I ask Paul to pull 
> some changes that touches the following drivers:
> 
> drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-scc.c           |    2 +-
> drivers/net/ucc_geth.c                  |   30 ++++----
> drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm1.c |    4 +-
> drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c |    4 +-

I don't see a patch, just a diffstat.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html