lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 2 May 2007 10:53:35 -0500
From:	Kumar Gala <>
To:	Jeff Garzik <>
Cc:	David Miller <>,,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Rename get_property to of_get_property: drivers/net

On May 2, 2007, at 9:17 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Apr 28, 2007, at 10:47 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Stephen Rothwell <>
>>> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:44:46 +1000
>>>> So can I take this as a future OK for architecture specific network
>>>> drivers changes to go through the architecture trees (cc'd to you)?
>>> It's been my experience that if I'm just working through some
>>> platform or bus specific API changes, people like Jeff tend to
>>> not mind if it goes via ARCH trees and the like.
>> Is this acceptable?   Just want to make sure before I ask Paul to  
>> pull some changes that touches the following drivers:
>> drivers/net/fs_enet/mac-scc.c           |    2 +-
>> drivers/net/ucc_geth.c                  |   30 ++++----
>> drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm1.c |    4 +-
>> drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c |    4 +-
> I don't see a patch, just a diffstat.

I haven't sent a patch, just asking the question if I need to break  
it up or not.

- k
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists