lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200705111622.24680.joakim.koskela@hiit.fi>
Date:	Fri, 11 May 2007 16:22:24 +0300
From:	Joakim Koskela <joakim.koskela@...t.fi>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Problem with xfrm (ipsec) as state/spi selected solely on outer ip addresses

Hi all, 

I'm running a system where there might be multiple simultenously
active ipsec states between two hosts (ipv6, but guess it applies to
v4 as well) where the outer ip is the same for all states, but the
inner differ (using beet mode).

The problem is that after establishing these states, it seems that the
one associated with outgoing traffic is selected solely by the outer
address (the first state matching the outer ip-pairs is used), which
usually results in the wrong spi and the packet being dropped at the
receiver.

I've circumvented the problem by modifying the state selection
algorithm in xfrm_state_find() [xfrm_state.c] to prefer, if possible,
states which also match by the inner addresses. Is this really a
problem of the selection algorithm, or might I be doing something 
wrong elsewhere?

Here's the changes I've done to make it work for me.  As said, it
prefers states with matching inner-address, but if none is found it
works as before:


diff -urN  a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c 2007-05-11 15:37:35.000000000 +0300
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c 2007-05-11 15:37:35.000000000 +0300
@@ -374,6 +374,17 @@
                                    (best->km.dying == x->km.dying &&
                                     best->curlft.add_time < x->curlft.add_time))
                                        best = x;
+                               else if (pol->selector.family == x->sel.family &&
+                                        (pol->selector.family == AF_INET6 &&
+                                         !ipv6_addr_cmp((struct in6_addr *)&pol->selector.daddr,
+                                                        (struct in6_addr *)&x->sel.daddr) &&
+                                         !ipv6_addr_cmp((struct in6_addr *)&pol->selector.saddr,
+                                                        (struct in6_addr *)&x->sel.saddr)) ||
+                                        (pol->selector.family == AF_INET &&
+                                         pol->selector.daddr.a4 == x->sel.daddr.a4 &&
+                                         pol->selector.saddr.a4 == x->sel.saddr.a4))
+                                       best = x;
+
                        } else if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ACQ) {
                                acquire_in_progress = 1;
                        } else if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ERROR ||

br, j

--
Joakim Koskela
Helsinki Institute for Information Technology, http://www.hiit.fi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ