[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <464B587A.70804@garzik.org>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 15:16:10 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000: Fix msi enable leak on error, don't print error
message, cleanup
Rick Jones wrote:
> But that is rather incidental isn't it? Would some sort of system
> health monitor be likely to be checking that for interrupt flavors? And
Well, that's where the information is exported in a standard way. I
hope you're not suggesting that a system health monitor should be
parsing random, driver-specific printk messages to obtain the same
information?
> just looking at /proc/interrupts, while it tells you what sort of
> interrupt is being used, it doesn't (IIRC) say anything about what sort
> of interrupt the driver _tried_ to use.
True.
In the context of this thread, it could be any number of reasons: MSI
isn't compiled in. MSI was disabled at runtime via kernel command line.
MSI was disabled by BIOS quirk. MSI enable was attempted, but failed
for some reason.
None of those reasons are really driver-specific, or need
driver-specific complaint messages.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists