[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <464DE6C0.7050505@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 10:47:44 -0700
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To: David Acker <dacker@...net.com>, Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
CC: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...ox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix e100 rx path on ARM (was [PATCH] e100 rx: or s and
el bits)
David Acker wrote:
> Kok, Auke wrote:
>> First impression just came in: It seems RX performance is dropped to
>> 10mbit. TX is unaffected and runs at 94mbit/tcp, but RX the new code
>> seems to misbehave and fluctuate, dropping below 10mbit after a few
>> netperf runs and staying there...
>>
>> ideas?
>
> I found the problem. Another casualty of working with two different kernels at once...arg.
> The blank rfd needs to have its el-bit clear now. Here is the new and improved patch.
> - nic->blank_rfd.command = cpu_to_le16(cb_el & cb_s);
> + nic->blank_rfd.command = 0;
OK, that fixed it and it's getting 94mbit/tcp rx now without issues. Milton, can
you look at this patch? I'd like some more feedback. Meanwhile I will try to get
this tested on a variety of e100 NICs, which will take a few days.
Thanks,
Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists