lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <464DE584.7030008@ev-en.org>
Date:	Fri, 18 May 2007 20:42:28 +0300
From:	Baruch Even <baruch@...en.org>
To:	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [TCP] Sysctl: document tcp_max_ssthresh (Limited Slow-Start)

Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
> ---
>  Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt |   13 +++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
> index ce16e6a..44ba8d4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
> @@ -239,6 +239,19 @@ tcp_max_orphans - INTEGER
>  	more aggressively. Let me to remind again: each orphan eats
>  	up to ~64K of unswappable memory.
>  
> +tcp_max_ssthresh - INTEGER
> +	Limited Slow-Start for TCP with Large Congestion Windows defined in
> +	RFC3742. Limited slow-start is a mechanism to limit grow of the

s/grow/growth/

> +	congestion window on the region where congestion window is larger than
> +	tcp_max_ssthresh. A TCP connection with a large congestion window could
> +	have its congestion window increased by thousand (or even more)
> +	segments per RTT by the traditional slow-start procedure which might be
> +	counter-productive to TCP performance when packet losses start to
> +	occur. With limited slow-start TCP increments congestion window at
> +	most tcp_max_ssthresh/2 segments per RTT when the congestion window is

I'm not a native English speaker but "at most" sounds a bit awkward to
me, maybe change it to "by no more than". But I'm sure someone can find
a better phrasing.

Baruch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ