[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070522004921.GA8130@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:49:21 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert.xu@...hat.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>, jeff@...zik.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, greg@...e.de,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000: Don't enable polling in open() (was: e1000: assertion hit in e1000_clean(), kernel 2.6.21.1)
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:16:35PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:51:35PM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
> > Herbert Xu wrote:
> > "netif_poll_enable can only be called if you've previously called
> > netif_poll_disable. Otherwise a poll might already be in action
> > and you may get a crash like this."
> >
> > Removing the call to netif_poll_enable in e1000_open should fix this issue,
> > the only other call to netif_poll_enable is in e1000_up() which is only
> > reached after a device reset or resume.
> >
> > Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8455
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240339
>
> This probably doesn't solve the latter bug.
> The code you reference isn't there in the kernel tested in that bug
> (2.6.21) In 2.6.21, netif_poll_enable is only called from
> e1000_up(), not e1000_open()
Yes we need a different fix for 2.6.21. There e1000_open calls
e1000_up which is why we still get the netif_poll_enable.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists