[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <de086868a64685afb768ecd78423a14f@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 02:29:52 +0200
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: linas@...tin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org,
Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH 4/10] spidernet: zero out a pointer.
>> If you're going to be paranoid, shouldn't you do something here to
>> make
>> sure the value's hit the device?
>
> I thought the whole point of paranoia is that its inexplicable.
>
> Here's a delusional reply: I didn't see any point to it.
> 1) a wmb would add overhead
A wmb() doesn't guarantee the write has reached the device.
> 2) the hardware is supposed to be looking at the status flag,
> anyway, and not misbehaving.
But you're paranoid, right? Can't trust that device! :-)
Segher
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists