netdev - Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH 4/10] spidernet: zero out a pointer.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 May 2007 02:29:52 +0200
From:	Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	linas@...tin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org,
	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH 4/10] spidernet: zero out a pointer.

>> If you're going to be paranoid, shouldn't you do something here to 
>> make
>> sure the value's hit the device?
>
> I thought the whole point of paranoia is that its inexplicable.
>
> Here's a delusional reply: I didn't see any point to it.
> 1) a wmb would add overhead

A wmb() doesn't guarantee the write has reached the device.

> 2) the hardware is supposed to be looking at the status flag,
>    anyway, and not misbehaving.

But you're paranoid, right?  Can't trust that device! :-)


Segher

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html