[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070531050616.GA32391@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 15:06:16 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Cc: Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: REGRESSION: panic on e1000 driver
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:51:14PM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
>
> this has been an age-old confusion that I never grasped either, so I
> perfectly understand why you added the explicit e1000_disable_irq call in
> the other patch (and think thats a great idea). But really, there should be
> a way for a driver to tell the stack that it should really keep it's hands
> off :)
Well yes, you can get the stack to keep away by not registering your
device :)
> BTW e1000 currently triggers a single irq manually in the watchdog as link
> goes up, so that might be the one that is giving problems now. In any case
> I can't reproduce any of it - perhaps my hardware is too fast. Time to whip
> out the pIII :o
Hmm, if it's triggered by the watchdog then that means the watchdog has
been scheduled. However, it seems that the only way to schedule it is
through an interrupt?
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists