[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <465E596A.3010400@hartkopp.net>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 07:13:14 +0200
From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC: Urs Thuermann <urs@...ogud.escape.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Oliver Hartkopp <oliver.hartkopp@...kswagen.de>,
Urs Thuermann <urs.thuermann@...kswagen.de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>
>> Btw. it's really worth to look at it again. I just had the idea to
>> access the loopback flag via skb->sk->opt->loopback (argpfl!) on the TX
>> path and skb->sk on the RX path. This would avoid skb->sk to be set to
>> NULL but need to have this loopback flag to be implemented in each CAN
>> socket opt.
>>
>
>
> Yes, thats what I wanted to suggest. You should even be able
> to use skb->sk->opt->loopback on the receive path before you
> queue the packet to the socket.
>
Using skb->sk->opt->loopback on the receive path is not possible as you
also have to deal with 'real' data received from a 'real' netdevice,
where no sk is bound to the skb. The idea is to check on the rx path ,
if sbk->sk is 'me' and then trash the packet according to my sockopt
settings.
Regards,
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists