[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4660A044.5090007@garzik.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:40:04 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Jeff Haran <jharan@...cade.COM>
CC: linux-net@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ETHTOOL_GSET IOCTL on GigE links
Jeff Haran wrote:
> With 10/100 Mbps links it wasn't such an issue since the devices tend to
> support the same forced speeds and duplexities as they are capable of
> negotiating, but with GigE links that's not always the case, at least
> not according to what I've read. For instance, the following doc from
> Sun http://www.sun.com/blueprints/0704/817-7526.pdf says that IEEE
> 802.3ab says you can't force 1000Base-T over copper media (see page 4),
> whereas some other physical media allow GigE to run without
> autonegotiation (there's apparently this "serdes" interface that allows
> it, for instance).
>
> Seems like there should be another field named something like
> supported_forced to indicate what can be forced on the interface. Either
> that or some more SUPPORTED_* bits to indicate supported forced modes.
The 'supported' field has nothing at all to do with auto-negotiation.
The driver should list all possibilities in that field, even if some are
ONLY supported via 'forced' selection.
Jeff
P.S. netdev@...ux.kernel.org is a far more active list, and is where
the network stack/driver developers appear.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists