[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4665D64F.4040601@candelatech.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 14:31:59 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC VLAN 10/10]: Use rtnl_link API
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> [VLAN]: Use rtnl_link API
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
> +static int vlan_newlink(struct net_device *dev,
> + struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
> +{
> + struct vlan_dev_info *vlan = VLAN_DEV_INFO(dev);
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!tb[IFLA_LINK])
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (!data[IFLA_VLAN_ID])
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + vlan->vlan_id = nla_get_u16(data[IFLA_VLAN_ID]);
> + vlan->real_dev = __dev_get_by_index(nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_LINK]));
It seems you are scribbling on dev->priv before you validate that
it is OK to do so?
Or, maybe I'm just confused.
What is 'dev' here?
> +
> + if (!vlan->real_dev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> + err = vlan_check_real_dev(vlan->real_dev, vlan->vlan_id);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
> +
> + err = vlan_changelink(dev, tb, data);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
> +
> + return register_vlan_dev(dev);
> +}
Other than this, this patch and the others in this series
look fine (except for the 4095 VID issue that we communicated
about earlier).
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists