[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4665DC96.8020100@trash.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:58:46 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC VLAN 10/10]: Use rtnl_link API
Ben Greear wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>> [VLAN]: Use rtnl_link API
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>
>
>> +static int vlan_newlink(struct net_device *dev,
>> + struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
>> +{
>> + struct vlan_dev_info *vlan = VLAN_DEV_INFO(dev);
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + if (!tb[IFLA_LINK])
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + if (!data[IFLA_VLAN_ID])
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + vlan->vlan_id = nla_get_u16(data[IFLA_VLAN_ID]);
>> + vlan->real_dev = __dev_get_by_index(nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_LINK]));
>
>
> It seems you are scribbling on dev->priv before you validate that
> it is OK to do so?
>
> Or, maybe I'm just confused.
>
> What is 'dev' here?
Its a newly created device, not registered at this point. The
vlan_dev_info structure is used to communicate the settings
to vlan_dev_init() (also by the ioctl wrapper).
> Other than this, this patch and the others in this series
> look fine (except for the 4095 VID issue that we communicated
> about earlier).
Thanks, I'll fix that, add the remaining bits, and repost.
I think its only REORDER_HDR support that is still missing.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists