[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46698B24.2030309@candelatech.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:00:20 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Virtual ethernet tunnel (v.2)
Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Ben Greear wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
>>>> I would also like some way to identify veth from other device types,
>>>> preferably
>>>> something like a value in sysfs. However, that should not hold up
>>>>
>>>>
>>> We can do this with ethtool. It can get and print the driver name of
>>> the device.
>>>
>>>
>> I think I'd like something in sysfs that we could query for any
>> interface. Possible return
>> strings could be:
>> VLAN
>> VETH
>> ETH
>> PPP
>> BRIDGE
>> AP /* wifi access point interface */
>> STA /* wifi station */
>> ....
>>
>> I will cook up a patch for consideration after veth goes in.
>>
>>
>
> Ben, could you please tell what sysfs features do you
> plan to implement?
>
I think this is the only thing that has a chance of getting into the kernel.
Basically, I have a user-space app and I want to be able to definitively
know the type for
all interfaces. Currently, I have a hodge-podge of logic to query
various ioctls and /proc
files and finally, guess by name if nothing else works. There must be a
better way :P
I have another sysfs patch that allows setting a default skb->mark for
an interface so that you can set the skb->mark
before it hits the connection tracking logic, but I'm been told this one
has very little chance
of getting into the kernel. The skb->mark patch is only useful (as far
as I can tell) if you
also include a patch Patrick McHardy did for me that allowed the
conn-tracking logic to
use skb->mark as part of it's tuple. This allows me to do NAT between
virtual routers
(routing tables) on the same machine using veth-equivalent drivers to
connect the
routers. He thinks this will probably not ever get into the kernel either.
I have another sysctl related send-to-self patch that also has little
chance of getting into the kernel, but
it might be quite useful with veth (it's useful to me..but my needs
aren't exactly mainstream :))
I'll post this separately for consideration....
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists