[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4669B2BD.5060208@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 21:49:17 +0200
From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@....net>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
CC: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Virtual ethernet tunnel (v.2)
On 08.06.2007 19:00, Ben Greear wrote:
> I have another sysfs patch that allows setting a default skb->mark for
> an interface so that you can set the skb->mark
> before it hits the connection tracking logic, but I'm been told this one
> has very little chance
> of getting into the kernel. The skb->mark patch is only useful (as far
> as I can tell) if you
> also include a patch Patrick McHardy did for me that allowed the
> conn-tracking logic to
> use skb->mark as part of it's tuple. This allows me to do NAT between
> virtual routers
> (routing tables) on the same machine using veth-equivalent drivers to
> connect the
> routers. He thinks this will probably not ever get into the kernel either.
Are these patches available somewhere? I'm currently doing NAT between
virtual routers by some advanced iproute2/iptables trickery, but I have
no way to handle the occasional tuple conflict.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists