netdev - RE: [PATCH 3/3] NET: [CORE] Stack changes to add multiqueue hardware support API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <D5C1322C3E673F459512FB59E0DDC329031117B0@orsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:01:18 -0700
From:	"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
To:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <jeff@...zik.org>,
	"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>, <hadi@...erus.ca>,
	<kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] NET: [CORE] Stack changes to add multiqueue hardware support API

> From: PJ Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:42:29 -0700
> 
> > +
> > + 	/* The TX queue control structures */
> > + 	struct net_device_subqueue	*egress_subqueue;
> > + 	int				egress_subqueue_count;
> 
> Since every net device will have at least one subqueue, I 
> would suggest that you do this as follows:
> 
> 1) In net_device change the quoted part of the patch above to:
> 
> 	int				egress_subqueue_count;
> 	struct net_device_subqueue	egress_subqueue[0];
> 
> 2) In alloc_netdev():
> 
>    Factor (sizeof(struct egress_subqueue) * num_subqueues) into
>    the net_device allocation size, place the "priv" area after
>    the subqueues.
> 
> This will save us pointer dereferences on all of these quite 
> common accesses.

I've been thinking about this more today, so please bear with me if I'm
missing something.  Right now, with how qdisc_restart() is running, we'd
definitely call netif_subqueue_stopped(dev, skb->queue_mapping) for all
multi-ring and single-ring devices.  However, with Jamal's and Krishna's
qdisc_restart() rewrite patch, the checks for netif_queue_stopped() and
netif_subqueue_stopped() would be pushed into the qdisc's ->dequeue()
functions.  If that's the case, then the only checks on
egress_subqueue[x] would be for multi-ring adapters, or if someone was
silly enough to load sch_{rr|prio} onto a single-ring device with
multiqueue hardware support compiled in.  Given all of that, I'm not
sure allocating egress_subqueue[0] at compile time or runtime would make
any difference either way.  If I'm missing something, please let me know
- I'd like to reduce any unnecessary pointer dereferences if possible,
but given the proposed qdisc_restart(), I think the code as-is would be
ok.

Thanks,
-PJ Waskiewicz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html