lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:00:07 -0700
From:	Rick Jones <>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <>
Cc:, jamal <>,
	Krishna Kumar2 <>,
	Gagan Arneja <>,,
	Sridhar Samudrala <>,
	David Miller <>,
	Robert Olsson <>
Subject: Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching

On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 17:21 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Hi.
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 07:43:49AM -0400, jamal ( wrote:
> > Folks, we need help. Please run this on different hardware. Evgeniy, i
> > thought this kind of stuff excites you, no? ;-> (wink, wink).
> > Only the sender needs the patch but the receiver must be a more powerful
> > machine (so that it is not the bottleneck).
> I've ran several simple tests with desktop e1000 adapter I managed to
> find.
> Test machine is amd athlon64 3500+ with 1gb of ram.
> Another point is dektop core duo 3.4 ghz with 2 gb of ram and sky2
> driver.
> Simple test included test -> desktop and vice versa traffic with 128 and
> 4096 block size in netperf-2.4.3 setup.

Is that in conjunction with setting the test-specific -D to set
TCP_NODELAY, or was Nagle left-on?  If the latter, perhaps timing issues
could be why the confidence intervals weren't hit since the relative
batching of 128byte sends into larger segments is something of a race.

rick jones

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists