lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:59:36 +0400
From:	Evgeniy Polyakov <>
To:	Rick Jones <>
Cc:	jamal <>, Krishna Kumar2 <>,
	Gagan Arneja <>,,
	Sridhar Samudrala <>,
	David Miller <>,
	Robert Olsson <>
Subject: Re: [WIP][PATCHES] Network xmit batching

On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 02:00:07PM -0700, Rick Jones ( wrote:
> > Simple test included test -> desktop and vice versa traffic with 128 and
> > 4096 block size in netperf-2.4.3 setup.
> Is that in conjunction with setting the test-specific -D to set
> TCP_NODELAY, or was Nagle left-on?  If the latter, perhaps timing issues
> could be why the confidence intervals weren't hit since the relative
> batching of 128byte sends into larger segments is something of a race.

I used this parameters:
netperf -l 60 -H kano -t TCP_STREAM -i 10,2 -I 99,5 -- -m 128 -s 128K
-S 128K

so without nodelay.

With nodelay I've gotten:
batch-128: 128.91 mbit/sec
mainline-128: 140.57 mbit/sec

which is about 5 times less than withouth nodelay (~760 mbit/s)
Although nodelay results look more realistic.

> rick jones

	Evgeniy Polyakov
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists