netdev - Re: [RFD] L2 Network namespace infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:08:25 -0600
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] L2 Network namespace infrastructure

Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> writes:

>>>>Depending upon the data structure it will either be modified to hold
>>>>a per entry network namespace pointer or it there will be a separate
>>>>copy per network namespace.  For large global data structures like
>>>>the ipv4 routing cache hash table adding an additional pointer to the
>>>>entries appears the more reasonable solution.
>>>
>>>
>>>So the routing cache is shared between all namespaces?
>> 
>> 
>> Yes.  Each namespaces has it's own view so semantically it's not
>> shared.  But the initial fan out of the hash table 2M or something
>> isn't something we want to replicate on a per namespace basis even
>> assuming the huge page allocations could happen.
>> 
>> So we just tag the entries and add the network namespace as one more
>> part of the key when doing hash table look ups.
>
>
> I can wait for the patches, but I would be interested in how
> GC is performed and whether limits can be configured per
> namespace.

Currently I believe the gc code is unmodified in my patches.

Currently I have been focusing on the normal semantics and just
making something work in a mergeable fashion.

Limits and the like are comparatively easy to add in after the
rest is working so I haven't been focusing on that.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html