netdev - Re: [RFD] L2 Network namespace infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <467D7C79.8080604@candelatech.com>
Date:	Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:03:05 -0700
From:	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] L2 Network namespace infrastructure

Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>   
>> Will we be able to have a single application be in multiple name-spaces?
>>     
>
> That would break the whole point of namespaces...
>   
I was hoping that I could open a socket in one name-space and another in 
another name
space, and send traffic between them, within a single application.  This 
is basically what I can do now with my
send-to-self patch and (for more clever virtual-routing schemes + NAT, 
with a conn-track
patch that Patrick cooked up for me).  It seems these patches I use are 
not acceptable
for merge, so I was hoping name-spaces might work instead.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com> 
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html