[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070626221736.GA22252@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:17:36 +0200
From: tsbogend@...ha.franken.de (Thomas Bogendoerfer)
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
jgarzik@...ox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATE] Extract chip specific code out of lasi_82596.c
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 11:47:55PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de> :
> [...]
> > +static inline void init_rx_bufs(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct i596_private *lp = netdev_priv(dev);
> > + struct i596_dma *dma = lp->dma;
> > + int i;
> > + struct i596_rfd *rfd;
> > + struct i596_rbd *rbd;
> > +
> > + /* First build the Receive Buffer Descriptor List */
> > +
> > + for (i = 0, rbd = dma->rbds; i < rx_ring_size; i++, rbd++) {
> > + dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(PKT_BUF_SZ + 4);
> > +
> > + if (skb == NULL)
> > + panic(KERN_ERR "%s: alloc_skb() failed", __FILE__);
>
> The driver could use netdev_alloc_skb.
what's the advantage ?
> init_rx_bufs() should handle failure more gracefully and return a proper
> status code.
of course.
>
> [...]
> > +static int init_i596_mem(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> [...]
> > + if (request_irq(dev->irq, &i596_interrupt, 0, "i82596", dev)) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: IRQ %d not free\n", dev->name, dev->irq);
> > + goto failed_free_irq;
> > + }
> [...]
> > +failed_free_irq:
> > + free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
>
> Oops.
thanks, will fix.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists