[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4686DC81.5090908@garzik.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 18:43:13 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
CC: dhananjay.phadke@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rob@...xen.com,
Milan Bag <mbag@...xen.com>, Wen Xiong <wenxiong@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] NetXen: Graceful teardown of interface and hardware
upon module unload
Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Saturday 30 June 2007 22:38:47 dhananjay.phadke@...il.com wrote:
>> These changes allow driver close routine to be called during module unload,
>> to clean-up buffers and other software resources, flush queues etc. Also,
>> hardware is reset to pristine state.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Phadke <dhananjay@...xen.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Milan Bag <mbag@...xen.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wen Xiong <wenxiong@...ibm.com>
>
>> off = netxen_nic_pci_set_window(adapter, memaddr);
>> addr = pci_base_offset(adapter, off);
>> writel(data, addr);
>> + do {
>> + if (readl(addr) == data)
>> + break;
>> + msleep_interruptible(100);
>
> If you use msleep_interruptible(), I'd say you should check for
> the return value of that call and probably abort firmware
> processing here if a signal interrupted us.
While strictly this is true, I strongly urge the use of
non-interruptible sleeps when used in hardware-related delays. Very
rarely does one really want to care about signals for such cases.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists