[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab901500706301849h5f8e25c7k8e2c0a8f04dd3198@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 07:19:13 +0530
From: "Dhananjay Phadke" <dhananjay.phadke@...il.com>
To: "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: "Michael Buesch" <mb@...sch.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
rob@...xen.com, "Milan Bag" <mbag@...xen.com>,
"Wen Xiong" <wenxiong@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] NetXen: Graceful teardown of interface and hardware upon module unload
This stage is safe to bail out on signal. It's initializing about a
hundred registers
and trying to guaranty by retrying, so can get stretched too much on faulty h/w.
-Dhananjay
On 7/1/07, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> While strictly this is true, I strongly urge the use of
> non-interruptible sleeps when used in hardware-related delays. Very
> rarely does one really want to care about signals for such cases.
>
> Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists