[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46894BFF.70405@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 12:03:27 -0700
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To: Nils Rennebarth <nils.rennebarth@...kwerk-ec.com>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
Marian Balakowicz <m8@...ihalf.com>,
"linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz"
<linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
"len.brown@...el.com" <len.brown@...el.com>,
NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: quirk_e100_interrupt() called too early
Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Thursday 28 June 2007 10:01:08 am Kok, Auke wrote:
>> I copied Nils Rennebarth, who originally reported the bug:
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5918
>> in case he can test your patch.
>
> Most of the embedded boards we now work with appear to exhibit the same
> behaviour: During boot the
>
> Firmware left 0000:01:05.0 e100 interrupts enabled, disabling
>
> message appears for all four e100 nics. (The mainboard is a em-8510A
> btw.) When I have time I could try if the quirk still works with the
> mentioned patch, but I am quite busy with other things at the moment.
well, we're too late for 2.6.22 I think so you have some time. However I'd like
to make sure we can get this in with 2.6.23. Alternatively, someone could always
send me one of these boards ;)
Thanks for taking the time to test
Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists