netdev - Re: quirk_e100_interrupt() called too early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:00:07 +0200
From:	Marian Balakowicz <m8@...ihalf.com>
To:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Cc:	bjorn.helgaas@...com, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	len.brown@...el.com, NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: quirk_e100_interrupt() called too early

Kok, Auke wrote:
> Marian Balakowicz wrote:
>> The patch below delays the quirk_100_interrupt() to pci_fixup_final
>> phase, which happens after bus enumeration and before device PCI enable
>> and device driver initialization - so, it seem to be still a good place
>> for this quirk. It works fine for me but I only tested it on a tqm5200.
>> Could someone please help and verify that on other platforms?
> 
> will try to do. This sounds indeed like the proper thing to do. Unfortunately I 
> don't have any NICs to repro this on (allthough I have a ppc box with said 
> firmware probe method).
> 
> Bjorn orignially wrote this patch, perhaps he can comment on the fixup move?
> 
> Also, please send a signed-off-by patch so I can push it forward as usual.

Sure, will do that, just wanted someone to have a look at it in the first place.

Best Regards,
Marian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html