[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46897934.5040101@garzik.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 18:16:20 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
CC: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Veeraiyan, Ayyappan" <ayyappan.veeraiyan@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ixgbe: Introduce new 10GbE driver for Intel 82598 based
PCI Express adapters...
Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 July 2007 00:02:57 Kok, Auke wrote:
>> well, FWIW when I started looking at adding these flags I looked in various
>> subsystems in the kernel and picked an implementation that suited. Guess what
>> pci.h has? ...:
>>
>> unsigned int msi_enabled:1;
>> unsigned int msix_enabled:1;
>>
>> this is literally where I copied the example from
>>
>> I suppose I can fix those, but I really don't understand what all the fuzz is
>> about here. We're only conserving memory and staying far away from the real
>
> I'm not sure if these bitfields actually _do_ conserve memory.
> Generated code gets bigger (need bitwise masks and stuff).
> Code also needs memory. It probably only conserves memory, if the
> structure is instanciated a lot.
Actually, that's a good point. On several RISC architectures it
certainly generates bigger code.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists