lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 02 Jul 2007 18:16:20 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <>
To:	Michael Buesch <>
CC:	"Kok, Auke" <>,
	Christoph Hellwig <>,
	Stephen Hemminger <>,
	"Veeraiyan, Ayyappan" <>,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ixgbe: Introduce new 10GbE driver for Intel 82598 based
 PCI Express adapters...

Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 July 2007 00:02:57 Kok, Auke wrote:
>> well, FWIW when I started looking at adding these flags I looked in various 
>> subsystems in the kernel and picked an implementation that suited. Guess what 
>> pci.h has? ...:
>> 	unsigned int msi_enabled:1;
>> 	unsigned int msix_enabled:1;
>> this is literally where I copied the example from
>> I suppose I can fix those, but I really don't understand what all the fuzz is 
>> about here. We're only conserving memory and staying far away from the real 
> I'm not sure if these bitfields actually _do_ conserve memory.
> Generated code gets bigger (need bitwise masks and stuff).
> Code also needs memory. It probably only conserves memory, if the
> structure is instanciated a lot.

Actually, that's a good point.  On several RISC architectures it 
certainly generates bigger code.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists