netdev - Re: [E1000-devel] e1000: backport ich9 support from 7.5.5 ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <468A4B87.1070100@garzik.org>
Date:	Tue, 03 Jul 2007 09:13:43 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:	"Williams, Mitch A" <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>,
	Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>,
	"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Jason Lunz <lunz@...lexsecurity.com>
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000: backport ich9 support from 7.5.5 ?

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 04:52:52PM -0700, Williams, Mitch A wrote:
>> - We include e1000new in 2.6.23, along side e1000.  We expose ICH9
>>   device IDs in e1000new, and gate the rest of the IDs inside
>>   #ifndef CONFIG_E1000.
> 
> No.  Hardware support in one driver should never be affected by config
> options in another drivers.

Agreed.


> Also I really think there shouldn't be one single driver for all the
> hardware as outlined by intel people in this thread.

Agreed.

(as I've been saying)

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html