[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070704064159.GA2057@ff.dom.local>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 08:41:59 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S\. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [NETPOLL] netconsole: fix soft lockup when removing module
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:52:26AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> From my recent patch:
>
> > > #1
> > > Until kernel ver. 2.6.21 (including) cancel_rearming_delayed_work()
> > > required a work function should always (unconditionally) rearm with
> > > delay > 0 - otherwise it would endlessly loop. This patch replaces
> > > this function with cancel_delayed_work(). Later kernel versions don't
> > > require this, so here it's only for uniformity.
>
> But Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru> found:
>
> > But 2.6.22 doesn't need this change, why it was merged?
> >
> > In fact, I suspect this change adds a race,
> ...
>
> His description was right (thanks), so this patch reverts #1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
Oleg,
I think maybe you could ack these 2 netconsole patches...
They were done on your request but it looks like Andrew
is waiting on something...
Thanks,
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists