| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070704064159.GA2057@ff.dom.local> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 08:41:59 +0200 From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl> To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "David S\. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [NETPOLL] netconsole: fix soft lockup when removing module On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:52:26AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > From my recent patch: > > > > #1 > > > Until kernel ver. 2.6.21 (including) cancel_rearming_delayed_work() > > > required a work function should always (unconditionally) rearm with > > > delay > 0 - otherwise it would endlessly loop. This patch replaces > > > this function with cancel_delayed_work(). Later kernel versions don't > > > require this, so here it's only for uniformity. > > But Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru> found: > > > But 2.6.22 doesn't need this change, why it was merged? > > > > In fact, I suspect this change adds a race, > ... > > His description was right (thanks), so this patch reverts #1. > > Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl> Oleg, I think maybe you could ack these 2 netconsole patches... They were done on your request but it looks like Andrew is waiting on something... Thanks, Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists