netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:10:44 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	crquan@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
	pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to
 dev.c

David Miller wrote:
> From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:01:38 +0200
> 
> 
>>rae l wrote:
>>
>>>All in one word, I don't think the single file dev_mcast.c is needed
>>>anymore.
>>
>>Agreed. But dev.c is growing larger and larger, maybe dev_addr.c?
>>Or dev_config.c, with some of the other device configuration functions?
> 
> 
> I don't know, a sizable dev.c is inevitable, allows better refactoring
> and consolidation.  And the be honest you're going to have to likely
> touch things in dev.c whenever you make changes to dev_addr.c or
> whatever you want to name it. :-)


You're probably right. Killing dev_mcast.c makes sense to me though.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html