[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <469ED3D7.6040905@garzik.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:00:39 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
CC: NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: igb: Intel 82575 Gigabit Ethernet driver (PCI-Express)
Kok, Auke wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> We are pleased to announce a new Gigabit Ethernet product and its driver
> to the
> linux community. This product is the Intel(R) 82575 Gigabit Ethernet
> adapter
> family. Physical adapters will be available to the public soon. These
> adapters
> come in 2- and 4-port versions (copper PHY) currently. Other variants
> will be
> available later.
>
> The 82575 chipset supports significantly different features that warrant
> a new
> driver. The descriptor format is (just like the ixgbe driver) different.
> The
> device can use multiple MSI-X vectors and multiple queues for both send and
> receive. This allows us to optimize some of the driver code specifically
> as well
> compared to the e1000-supported devices.
>
> This driver was forked from e1000 several months ago and extensively
> reworked
> and cleaned up since. The driver was also tested on several platforms in
> our
> validation labs.
>
> Allthough some of the codebase is currently shared with the e1000 driver
> (this
> igb driver has a copy of that code where needed), we realize that many
> of the
> changes that we are discussing for e1000 (the pci-express adapters that
> e1000
> supports particularly) will also apply to this driver. However, since
> this is a
> completely new driver that is relatively free of all old NIC support, we
> feel
> that it is currently the right time to post this driver.
>
> Unfortunately, the patch to insert this driver is too large to send to
> netdev. I
> have therefore posted the patch on http:
>
> http://foo-projects.org/~sofar/igb.patch [558K]
> http://foo-projects.org/~sofar/igb.patch.bz2 [98K]
Just took a look at this.
This has the same problem as in the other thread -- huge internal API --
except this time, the problem is emphasized by the fact that the
majority of the API hooks only have a single user, making each hook and
API entry point demonstrably useless overhead.
Please remove the useless internal API and resubmit.
PLEASE take a look at how bnx2 and tg3 are structured.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists