[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0a09e5c0707241024p3533df25h5e8dc904d0e0778f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:24:54 -0700
From: "Andrew Grover" <andy.grover@...il.com>
To: "Al Viro" <viro@....linux.org.uk>, shannon.nelson@...el.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, christopher.leech@...el.com
Subject: Re: NET_DMA: where do we ever call dma_skb_copy_datagram_iovec() with NULL pinned_list?
On 7/20/07, Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> AFAICS, all callers of dma_skb_copy_datagram_iovec()
> are either
> * recursive for fragments, pass pinned_list unchanged or
> * called from tcp, with pinned_list coming from
> tp->ucopy.pinned_list and only when tp->ucopy.dma_chan is non-NULL.
>
> Now, all non-NULL assignments to ->dma_chan have the same form:
> if (!tp->ucopy.dma_chan && tp->ucopy.pinned_list)
> tp->ucopy.dma_chan = get_softnet_dma();
> IOW, if ->ucopy.pinned_list stays NULL, ->ucopy.dma_chan will do the same.
>
> Moreover, any place that resets ->ucopy.pinned_list will also reset
> ->ucopy.dma_chan.
>
> IOW, we can't ever get non-NULL tp->ucopy.dma_chan while tp->ucopy.pinned_list
> is NULL. So how can we ever get to the dma_memcpy_to_kernel_iovec()?
Shannon what do you think? Is this a bug, or does it no longer support
non-userspace iovecs?
Thanks -- Andy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists