[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46A8003F.1050208@garzik.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:00:31 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
hadi@...erus.ca, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC]: napi_struct V4
David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:55:08 -0400
>
>> I don't see any logic to your request, only added overhead for no reason.
>
> There may be some flawed logic in what Stephen stated, but
> the change really is needed.
>
> It must be atomic to execute the:
>
> enable_interrupts();
> netif_rx_complete();
>
> sequence wrt. the same code path in the interrupt handler.
Sure. And how did the existing code fail to achieve that?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists