netdev - Re: [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:21:59 +0100
From:	Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>
To:	Dave Johnson <djohnson+linux-kernel@...starentnetworks.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lksctp-developers@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Srinivas Akkipeddi <sakkiped@...rentnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses

On 26/07/07 00:49, Dave Johnson wrote:
> ipv6_addr_type() doesn't check for 'Unique Local IPv6 Unicast
> Addresses' (RFC4193) and returns IPV6_ADDR_RESERVED for that range.

> +	if ((st & htonl(0xFE000000)) == htonl(0xFC000000))
> +		return (IPV6_ADDR_UNICAST |
> +			IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_TYPE(IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_GLOBAL));			/* RFC 4193 */

But ULA's scope isn't global, shouldn't it be IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_ORGLOCAL ?

-- 
Simon Arlott
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html