[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46B19C88.8070104@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:57:44 +0800
From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@...fujitsu.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
lksctp-developers@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCTP: drop SACK if ctsn is not less than the next tsn
of assoc
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> This is a little better.
>
> One suggestion. The new function you create is almost exactly like
> sctp_sf_violation_chunklen() with the exception of the error string.
> Can you extract the common parts into a single function so that
> we don't have duplication of code.
>
> Thanks
> -vlad
>
>
>
>>>
>>> This is an interesting case, but I am not sure that simply discarding
>>> the SACK is the right thing.
>>>
>>> The peer in this case is violating the protocol whereby he is trying to
>>> advance the cumulative tsn ack to a point beyond the max tsn currently
>>> sent. I would vote for terminating the association in this case since
>>> either the peer is a mis-behaved implementation, or the association is
>>> under attack.
>>>
Patch has been modified base on comment.
Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@...fujitsu.com>
--- net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c.orig 2007-07-29 18:11:01.000000000 -0400
+++ net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c 2007-07-31 17:49:22.000000000 -0400
@@ -97,6 +97,13 @@
const struct sctp_association *asoc,
struct sctp_transport *transport);
+static sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_abort_violation(
+ const struct sctp_association *asoc,
+ void *arg,
+ sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands,
+ const __u8 *payload,
+ const size_t paylen);
+
static sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_violation_chunklen(
const struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
const struct sctp_association *asoc,
@@ -104,6 +111,13 @@
void *arg,
sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands);
+static sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_violation_ctsn(
+ const struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
+ const struct sctp_association *asoc,
+ const sctp_subtype_t type,
+ void *arg,
+ sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands);
+
/* Small helper function that checks if the chunk length
* is of the appropriate length. The 'required_length' argument
* is set to be the size of a specific chunk we are testing.
@@ -2880,6 +2894,13 @@
return SCTP_DISPOSITION_DISCARD;
}
+ /* If Cumulative TSN Ack beyond the max tsn currently
+ * send, terminating the association and respond to the
+ * sender with an ABORT.
+ */
+ if (!TSN_lt(ctsn, asoc->next_tsn))
+ return sctp_sf_violation_ctsn(ep, asoc, type, arg, commands);
+
/* Return this SACK for further processing. */
sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_PROCESS_SACK, SCTP_SACKH(sackh));
@@ -3691,40 +3712,21 @@
return SCTP_DISPOSITION_VIOLATION;
}
-
/*
- * Handle a protocol violation when the chunk length is invalid.
- * "Invalid" length is identified as smaller then the minimal length a
- * given chunk can be. For example, a SACK chunk has invalid length
- * if it's length is set to be smaller then the size of sctp_sack_chunk_t.
- *
- * We inform the other end by sending an ABORT with a Protocol Violation
- * error code.
- *
- * Section: Not specified
- * Verification Tag: Nothing to do
- * Inputs
- * (endpoint, asoc, chunk)
- *
- * Outputs
- * (reply_msg, msg_up, counters)
- *
- * Generate an ABORT chunk and terminate the association.
+ * Common function to handle a protocol violation.
*/
-static sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_violation_chunklen(
- const struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
+static sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_abort_violation(
const struct sctp_association *asoc,
- const sctp_subtype_t type,
void *arg,
- sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands)
+ sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands,
+ const __u8 *payload,
+ const size_t paylen)
{
struct sctp_chunk *chunk = arg;
struct sctp_chunk *abort = NULL;
- char err_str[]="The following chunk had invalid length:";
/* Make the abort chunk. */
- abort = sctp_make_abort_violation(asoc, chunk, err_str,
- sizeof(err_str));
+ abort = sctp_make_abort_violation(asoc, chunk, payload, paylen);
if (!abort)
goto nomem;
@@ -3756,6 +3758,57 @@
return SCTP_DISPOSITION_NOMEM;
}
+/*
+ * Handle a protocol violation when the chunk length is invalid.
+ * "Invalid" length is identified as smaller then the minimal length a
+ * given chunk can be. For example, a SACK chunk has invalid length
+ * if it's length is set to be smaller then the size of sctp_sack_chunk_t.
+ *
+ * We inform the other end by sending an ABORT with a Protocol Violation
+ * error code.
+ *
+ * Section: Not specified
+ * Verification Tag: Nothing to do
+ * Inputs
+ * (endpoint, asoc, chunk)
+ *
+ * Outputs
+ * (reply_msg, msg_up, counters)
+ *
+ * Generate an ABORT chunk and terminate the association.
+ */
+static sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_violation_chunklen(
+ const struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
+ const struct sctp_association *asoc,
+ const sctp_subtype_t type,
+ void *arg,
+ sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands)
+{
+ char err_str[]="The following chunk had invalid length:";
+
+ return sctp_sf_abort_violation(asoc, arg, commands, err_str,
+ sizeof(err_str));
+}
+
+/* Handle a protocol violation when the peer trying to advance the
+ * cumulative tsn ack to a point beyond the max tsn currently sent.
+ *
+ * We inform the other end by sending an ABORT with a Protocol Violation
+ * error code.
+ */
+static sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_violation_ctsn(
+ const struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
+ const struct sctp_association *asoc,
+ const sctp_subtype_t type,
+ void *arg,
+ sctp_cmd_seq_t *commands)
+{
+ char err_str[]="The cumulative tsn ack beyond the max tsn currently sent:";
+
+ return sctp_sf_abort_violation(asoc, arg, commands, err_str,
+ sizeof(err_str));
+}
+
/***************************************************************************
* These are the state functions for handling primitive (Section 10) events.
***************************************************************************/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists